<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype</link>
	<description>Speech Applications, MySQL, Python, Soccer, Java, Beer and Incinerating Toilets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:45:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure if there is any such feature built into Skype, but you may be able to use Ethereal to do this. It might be a lot of work to configure, though.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The biggest problem is that Skype tunnels a proprietary protocol over port 80. You would have to filter out the Skype traffic from the HTTP traffic going over that port (assuming you are trying to measure Skype bandwidth usage independently from all of your other network usage).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if there is any such feature built into Skype, but you may be able to use Ethereal to do this. It might be a lot of work to configure, though.</p>

<p>The biggest problem is that Skype tunnels a proprietary protocol over port 80. You would have to filter out the Skype traffic from the HTTP traffic going over that port (assuming you are trying to measure Skype bandwidth usage independently from all of your other network usage).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manan</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>Manan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 18:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Can u tell how much bytes is used while using skype phone to call from p2p. I mean as if someone has limited bytes to be used...................&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can u tell how much bytes is used while using skype phone to call from p2p. I mean as if someone has limited bytes to be used&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-1087</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 06:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-1087</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;8 kbytes per second = 64 kbps&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I should have written the number in bits to be clearer, but the value is the same. I wrote it in bytes instead of bits only because the Skype documentation also listed the bandwidth in bytes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While VoIP calls with a G.729 codec are about 8 kbps, calls with a G.711 codec are 64 kbps. It turns out that when you are doing speech recognition, you can get much better results with a G.711 codec, especially for short utterances. But, for ordinary VoIP calls between two people, G.729 works quite well.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m still puzzled by why Skype eats up so much bandwidth, unless less it is true that they are using the extra bandwidth for their own purposes. If you don&#039;t think that is possible, I suggest you carefully read their Terms of Service.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8 kbytes per second = 64 kbps</p>

<p>I should have written the number in bits to be clearer, but the value is the same. I wrote it in bytes instead of bits only because the Skype documentation also listed the bandwidth in bytes.</p>

<p>While VoIP calls with a G.729 codec are about 8 kbps, calls with a G.711 codec are 64 kbps. It turns out that when you are doing speech recognition, you can get much better results with a G.711 codec, especially for short utterances. But, for ordinary VoIP calls between two people, G.729 works quite well.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m still puzzled by why Skype eats up so much bandwidth, unless less it is true that they are using the extra bandwidth for their own purposes. If you don&#8217;t think that is possible, I suggest you carefully read their Terms of Service.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mogos</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-1086</link>
		<dc:creator>mogos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-1086</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;PSTN call is actually 64kbps. (8bitsx8khz)
Most VOIP calls about 8-12kbps depending on codec and stops and starts in conversation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PSTN call is actually 64kbps. (8bitsx8khz)
Most VOIP calls about 8-12kbps depending on codec and stops and starts in conversation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telefonia internetowa Halo-Halo</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Telefonia internetowa Halo-Halo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Halo-Halo - Try this one out, it needs only 8 kbit/s (1 byte/sec). One problem this is in Polish, but user interface is intuitive.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halo-Halo &#8211; Try this one out, it needs only 8 kbit/s (1 byte/sec). One problem this is in Polish, but user interface is intuitive.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Skype</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-83</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Skype is the best!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype is the best!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leonard</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>leonard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-84</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Skype for Linux - see http://www.publicmind.com/enduser/category.jsp?node=409&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skype for Linux &#8211; see <a href="http://www.publicmind.com/enduser/category.jsp?node=409" rel="nofollow">http://www.publicmind.com/enduser/category.jsp?node=409</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robertp</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Robertp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/09/skype#comment-85</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i want to know where i can find the real setup for the skype program.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to know where i can find the real setup for the skype program.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

