<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copyright Disclaimer Sufficient?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient</link>
	<description>Speech Applications, Soccer, Hacking, Intellectual Property, and Incinerating Toilets</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jacques Distler</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacques Distler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient#comment-56</guid>
		<description>They indexed &lt;i&gt;everything&lt;/i&gt;, not just MP3 files.

And, as the example in my post demonstrated, you can easily do a similar search on Google and return directories full of MP3 files, with nary a copyright warning in sight.

There&#039;s a reason the DMCA had an exemption for search engines ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They indexed <i>everything</i>, not just MP3 files.</p>
<p>And, as the example in my post demonstrated, you can easily do a similar search on Google and return directories full of MP3 files, with nary a copyright warning in sight.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason the DMCA had an exemption for search engines &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Jacques, thanks for pointing out the fact that the students indexed all files. I read through the analysis you linked to while I was rewriting part of what I had written. I went back and added in &quot;indexing audio and other files&quot; in one place, but forgot to emphasize that elsewhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques, thanks for pointing out the fact that the students indexed all files. I read through the analysis you linked to while I was rewriting part of what I had written. I went back and added in &#8220;indexing audio and other files&#8221; in one place, but forgot to emphasize that elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient/comment-page-1#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Should I sue Google if I stumble upon a page of mine which was cached? It&#039;s a copyright violation after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should I sue Google if I stumble upon a page of mine which was cached? It&#8217;s a copyright violation after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stewart</title>
		<link>http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient/comment-page-1#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wombatnation.com/2003/04/copyright-disclaimer-sufficient#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Jacques&#039; comment suggests that it is not a copyright violation due to an exemption in the DMCA. The search engine company might also argue it is fair use.

There was a recent case where a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computeruser.com/news/02/02/09/news3.html&quot;&gt;photographer sued a search engine company&lt;/a&gt; over a set of cached thumbnail images of his photographs. The Ninth Circuit of Appeals ruled in favor of the search engine company.

I have no idea how the court would rule on a cache of the full web page. I haven&#039;t heard of anyone sueing a company over that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacques&#8217; comment suggests that it is not a copyright violation due to an exemption in the DMCA. The search engine company might also argue it is fair use.</p>
<p>There was a recent case where a <a href="http://www.computeruser.com/news/02/02/09/news3.html">photographer sued a search engine company</a> over a set of cached thumbnail images of his photographs. The Ninth Circuit of Appeals ruled in favor of the search engine company.</p>
<p>I have no idea how the court would rule on a cache of the full web page. I haven&#8217;t heard of anyone sueing a company over that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
